Then how did it occur that there is now stuff in the system?
Science has yet to explain how it is possible to create anything out of a complete void. Therefore, something bigger must have existed before the system. Maybe god.
Intel 6th generation CPU prices
-
Currently in the process of upgrading my parents' computer.
Zoom needs Intel i5 or above to use "background removal without green
screen". Sometimes, pro...
4 years ago
3 comments:
God as a concept is also necessary. The properties of such a concept would be what we call God, but the form would probably be different.
I don't think there can be a proof of God. But then, religion doesn't need proofs, just faith.
Science hasn't explained everything, but that doesn't prove (or disprove) the existence of God.
In case you misunderstood, I was not trying to prove the existence of God. I was trying to prove the existence of anything that fits the idea of God.
It could be humans, mothers or anything.
Religion does need some sort of justification for the existence of their God(s). Why do you think there's this creationism debate going on? They still have to prove themselves, even if they make a fool of themselves.
Keep in mind that they could just be assuming that there is something that is God, and then basing their knowledge around that. I don't see that as pitiful or stupid. I think it's quite ingenious.
Forget about religion. I'm not trying to push any of that sort of stuff anyway.
Ok, it doesn't prove the God of religions, but it does show that there is a need for God.
Either my proof is wrong and hence God doesn't exist, or I am right, then God has to exist.
If my proof am wrong, this problem will last for as long as humans are around.
Good try with the last thing. TOK teachers would have been very proud. But that isn't too helpful. The fields of science have yet to explain this, but so what?
Post a Comment