Right now, I am debating whether it is necessary to wear hiking boots for hiking. I have not hiked in one ever since the last AYP expedition.
- Hiking boots, even the gore-tex ones, don't prevent water from getting through. (Remember me pouring water out of my boot after the second expedition? Completely soaked.)
- Hiking boots grip sucks (at least mine does) - I'd love to slide down hills with it, but that sounds dangerous, especially on HKAYP "expeditions"
- Hiking boots are really heavy - I prefer my running shoes 100 times more than old stinking boots.
- Hiking boots tire my legs way faster - because they are so heavy and immobile (at least mine are). They don't allow me to run in them, and I think I consume way more energy lobbing them around.
- Hiking boots are way too protective - too much rubber and padding and stuff around the shoe making it hard to feel the ground.
- Hiking boots are expensive compared to other types of footware that can be used for hiking. I can use the money to go get a new rucksack!
- Hiking boots give a false sense of security - most snakes can sink their fangs deep enough anyway - no point.
- Hiking boots get hot real fast - the breathability of the running shoe cannot be beaten. Not yet.
- I am not sure when was the last time I saw a terrorist go around wearing boots. Are boots necessary?
- Eric Lam, the guy in our group for AYP, didn't wear boots for the first two (the last one I'm not sure).
- The two boys in the Balzac and the little seamstress didn't wear hiking boots, but their foot still survived!
- Same goes for riding boots - my instructor keeps bugging me to get those. Until now, I insist on wearing the minimal footwear.
A question - What part of your foot do you walk on?
Ok, some of these reasons can be solved by getting another boot.